After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. From lie detection tools tested at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being utilized for asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to navigate these systems and to go after their right for safety.
It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from opening the stations of cover. It www.ascella-llc.com further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: although they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.